me either
Any update? Iâm loving NewsBlur, but the inability to use tags is making me twitchy
whatâs going on with this, totally annoying!
I second this.
Now is the time to really go shopping for a GReader replacement and my hand is itching in my pocket for NB â has been all this timeâ, but I canât go without tagging.
Itâs too much that I need to sort by subject/topic and then be able to quickly access later to just sit in one big unsorted corner under a starring system.
Also, as cool as the intelligence trainer is, I wonât be using it. My intelligence trainer is, precisely, my own manual tagging, chop chop, sweet and simple.
I see Samuel has been working on this? Waiting for tagging to come in effect so I can test it.
On a related note, another (free) news reader was actually able to import my tagged stories from GReader. The bad news is theyâre probably swamped because the feeds simply donât update. So my tagged articles are saved elsewhere, but feed updates over there are as brand new as two days ago. Awesome.
Just saying, because thatâs one more reason to make me wanna ditch their free service in favor of NB.
So, thank you Samuel for listening to our requests.
+1
Please add a custom tags feature (and also browse stories by tags).
What replacement did you find? I need this functionality as well.
Yes, it is that simple for many of us. Infinitely more helpful that your current intelligence trainer which never uses tags that are meaningful to me.
Articles expire? Why would anyone do that?
Also willing to pay for retention.
Iâll add my simple vision for tagging which is inline with what many people have requested here.
- Tag an article with custom tags (multiple)
- Ability to view articles by tag
- Tagged articles are automatically saved (they never expire)
Some people are also asking for (4) a feed for tags. Many of us donât need this so if you are looking for an easy solution start with the ability to tag articles without feeds. This should be a trivial design as you mentioned:
âI can think about building this in a way that makes sense and will only take me a day or two of solid work.â
After three years of debate Iâm surprised itâs not built yet Let me tell you a bit about the rationale since you said:
âit wouldnât be terribly difficult, but I just do not see the use case.â
and
âWhatâs the point in tagging items in a feed? So you can search for them later?â
Yes, this is precisely the reason, so you can search for them later like saved articles⌠only organized. Itâs the paradigm of browser bookmarks. You could ask, âwhat is the point of browser bookmarks?â The same point as tagging articles in Newsblur, an organizational reference tool.
From your about page you say:
âNewsBlur is a personal news reader that brings people together to talk about the world.â
and
âNewsBlur is an easy and organized way to read the news wherever you are.â
The assumption youâre making here is that history is not news. Youâve optimized Newsblur for only current or recent events, and perhaps that mission should be obvious in the product name itself. (After all, you could have gone with âInformationBlurâ :))
But names aside, let me suggest that the news of today is built on yesterdayâs news. How many published articles reference material that is a year old, five years, ten or even twenty years old? Consider articles that cover product, service or industry evolution. Pretty much anything in the technology sector is based heavily on historical comparison. Imagine if those authors had no access to the past. Indeed, what is the point of any news if not to illustrate things are different now than they were before?
I understand Newsblur doesnât cater to authors (though the blurblog feature suggests some form of authorship is an important part of the product). But your broader mission to âbring people together to talk about the worldâ is even more compelling in my view. Imagine a world where we the people can only talk about whatâs been published in the last 30 days. Perspectives would be terribly limited and ultimately driven by the group think of current times. Gone is the ability to engage in current news debate with the established perspective of history. Gone is the ability to verify and prove current assertions of past realities. True debates, deep and varying perspectives are washed out in the bright lights of the now, present and alleged future.
I think this goes directly against your primary goal. Talking about the world is only meaningful when referencing the past. This why people email things to themselves, why they establish catalogs of browser bookmarks, why the wayback machine was launched and why we are requesting a tagging feature in Newsblurâstuff matters now and forever. Next time someone posts an article debating the merits of 8bit interfaces in our modern computing world I can go back to my âretroâ tag and join the conversation⌠Except in this case it wonât be Newsblur thatâs âbringing people together to talk about the worldâ, itâs my email, browser bookmarks and the wayback machine.
So if you really want to fulfill your stated mission I would heavily consider adding this ability. Not only would you replace a variety of inadequate cataloging mechanisms, youâd bring the cataloging paradigm to the place that makes the most sense, the news stream.
(Or you can always change your mission to âbring people together to talk about the now!â :))
This is already done. Arbitrary tags can be added to saved stories. When you click the save story button, a text field for adding tags appears.
With the burst of traffic on the forum today, I look forward to testing tags on the iPad app update during the Labor Day holiday â and to paying gladly if tags work as discussed.
Best regards,
Great news! This was really hard to locate. Now that I found it I can get things going. Might consider moving the tagging option to the main story menu.
Actually I realized there is a setting to move these buttons to the bottom of the story which is a bit better for me than the right hand side (also always on the bottom). Would be great it there were an option to display on top! Thanks anyway for the tagging feature!
Well, search is still being thought about, and has yet to be built. But when it is built, custom tags will definitely be a part of that.
For me social is sharing, not just consuming.
Using feeds that I create based on what Iâve read, or a theme I like or an idea Iâd like to expand on (for example with some kind of tagging) I could then:
a) share that feed marked âidea1â with colleagues to improve work flow
b) bookmark the items tagged - âboomarkâ - save me reading it and then bookmarking it again - great for doing this on the move / mobile
c) tweet the items tagged - âtweetâ
d) message the items on facebook - marked âfbâ
and so onâŚ
I can think of a lot of use cases and those above are just a few suggestions that would help save a lot of time and make RSS a social experience, not just consuming.
However, Iâm just a user here, hence why Iâm asking the question and maybe I do things differently. Eventually though Iâll have to seek out an alternative if this does not seem to be a worthwhile use case.
Thatâs fine, Iâd rather Samuel said yes or no (I donât like hoping or pushing) and then I and any others can make our decision as to what we do and where we go next.
Iâm looking for an alternative to Google Reader and Iâm looking for a product that will:
- import my GReader tags (and tagged articles)
- allow me to add multiple tags to an article
- allow me to access articles by tag
Forgive me by asking for clarity, but does NewsBlur handle these features?
Thanks for replying
I need tags. More than anything else. I need exactly what Ann requested, so, Iâll just copy and paste from her:
- import my GReader tags (and tagged articles)
- allow me to add multiple tags to an article
- allow me to access articles by tag
I canât believe with the demise of Google Reader there arenât more people requesting to see tags on NB. Iâd gladly pay for it.
I have thousands of tagged news articles on Google Reader I need to be able to access and go back to on a daily basis to cover my beats.
Iâm almost resorting to emailing myself each and every one of them just not to lose it all. Have been up all night looking for a feed reader that will do 1/2/3, but to no avail â and I signed up for dozensâŚ
Is there any hope to see tags here on NB?
Thanks much.
It seems to me that tags could come before a full-blown search feature. Just let us add tags to articles (more than one tag per article, please!), give us a list of our tags, and let us click them to view everything that has the selected tag. For me, that would be a great first step.